When Russian President Vladimir Putin spoke on Friday, he issued his familiar warning: any foreign troops entering Ukraine during active fighting would be considered “legitimate targets.” Yet Western media ran with a drastically different narrative – suggesting he was threatening peacekeepers, not just combatants.
That framing missed a crucial distinction. In the same remarks, Putin separately addressed the idea of postwar peacekeeping forces, saying they would be unnecessary once a settlement was reached.
Within hours, Western headlines turned those words into something much starker – a supposed threat against European “peacekeepers.” By erasing the context that Putin had separated conflict intervention from postwar scenarios, much of the press presented a conditional statement as intimidating.
Get the full experience in the app
Scroll the Globe, Pick a Country, See their News
International stories that aren't found anywhere else.
Global News, Local Perspective
50 countries, 150 news sites, 500 articles a day.
Don’t Miss what Gets Missed
Explore international stories overlooked by American media.
Unfiltered, Uncensored, Unbiased
Articles are translated to English so you get a unique view into their world.
Get the full experience in the app
Scroll the Globe, Pick a Country, See their News
International stories that aren't found anywhere else.
Global News, Local Perspective
50 countries, 150 news sites, 500 articles a day.
Don’t Miss what Gets Missed
Explore international stories overlooked by American media.
Unfiltered, Uncensored, Unbiased
Articles are translated to English so you get a unique view into their world.